Despite its wild success, Facebook isn't especially good at making money — particularly in comparison to, say, Google. To change that, it'll have to double down in three crucial areas.
By Miguel Helft & Jessi Hempel
FORTUNE -- In Facebook's video IPO roadshow,
Sheryl Sandberg, the company's chief operating officer, delivers a
powerful line intended to impress potential investors: "In the United
States, every day on Facebook is like the season-finale of American Idol
-- the most popular show on television -- times two." It's an impactful
boast, but as it turns out, Sandberg is playing it pretty safe. Every
day, 188 million people log into Facebook in the U.S. and Canada. That's
actually four to five times the number who tuned in to the season
finale of American Idol. Wow, indeed.
And yet, Sandberg's boast also highlights a problem. American Idol's
season finale brought in more than $40 million in advertising, according
to industry estimates. On a typical day last year, Facebook (FB)
made just $5.6 million or so in the U.S. So conservatively, each set of
eyeballs trained on the mewling of contestants on Fox is worth at least
30 times more than those checking in with friends and family on
Facebook. And it's not just television that Facebook lags behind. Every
one of its 900 million users nets Facebook a little more than $4 in a year. By comparison, Google (GOOG)
earns at least 7 times more from each one of its users. In other words,
Facebook makes gobs of money because of its massive reach, not because
it is a particularly effective advertising medium.
As Facebook seeks to justify and sustain a mammoth valuation that seems certain to top $100 billion,
it faces enormous challenges. First and foremost, the social networking
service must find a way to accelerate the growth of its advertising
business, which slowed to 45% in the most recent quarter from nearly
twice that rate the year before. And it must do so in the face of
headwinds from the rapid shift of users from the Web to mobile devices,
where Facebook's monetization efforts are still nascent. In short, for
all its promise and its potential to revolutionize entire industries,
Facebook must prove to advertisers and investors that it can build a
global ad business to match the power of a social networking product
that has become a habit for nearly one of every seven people on the
planet.
To be sure, the fact that Facebook's advertising prowess lags behind
its preeminence as a social hub is by design. Zuckerberg has always made
the Facebook product his top priority, sometimes at the expense of the
company's ad business. But now that Facebook will be a public company,
his team will be under enormous pressure to deliver financial results
that keep investors happy. Here are three things he should focus on to
achieve that.
No. 1 Advertising
Facebook ads have become table stakes for any online display advertising campaign, but as these ads move from experimental purchases to the cornerstone of many advertising strategies, Facebook must show to advertisers that these spots deliver significant returns.
Facebook ads have become table stakes for any online display advertising campaign, but as these ads move from experimental purchases to the cornerstone of many advertising strategies, Facebook must show to advertisers that these spots deliver significant returns.
In the past year, Facebook's approach to advertising has changed.
Now, rather than simply sending salespeople out to sell its ad
inventory, Facebook has begun to hire MBA-carrying "relationship
managers" with experience in the industries from which the advertisers
hale. These folks call their clients "partners" instead of "advertisers"
and encourage large bands like Procter & Gamble (PG)
to stop chasing "Likes" and, instead, look at what people are actually
saying and doing on Facebook that relates to them -- engagement.
Facebook believes that if brands can jumpstart these conversations on
fan pages and within apps they'll naturally buy more ads.
Facebook attempted to coin new language for this when it launched its
latest advertising strategy last February. Advertisers can pay Facebook
to highlight "sponsored stories" in users' Newsfeeds. The idea is that
users will only see these sponsored stories when they are posted by a
friend or a business with which they've already chosen to connect. It
sounds great, but the effectiveness of sponsored stories is far from
proven. In fact, some brands are questioning the value of advertising on
Facebook altogether. GM (GM), which last year spent $10 million with Facebook, decided to stop advertising on the platform
because the company's marketing executives weren't seeing the impact
they desired. Unlike Google, which stumbled on a magic formula with
search marketing, Facebook has yet to find its silver bullet.
No. 2 Mobile
Facebook's users are decamping to mobile devices faster than the social network can keep up. American Facebookers who use the service on both their desktops and on mobile apps are spending more time on their smartphones and tablets -- about 7.4 hours each month, according to Comscore (SCOR) -- than on the website itself -- about 6.5 hours each month.
Facebook's users are decamping to mobile devices faster than the social network can keep up. American Facebookers who use the service on both their desktops and on mobile apps are spending more time on their smartphones and tablets -- about 7.4 hours each month, according to Comscore (SCOR) -- than on the website itself -- about 6.5 hours each month.
This poses two significant challenges for the company. First, mobile
screens are small so Facebook users see fewer ads. This unsettling trend
is disproportionately impacting some of Facebook's most important
advertising markets. In recent regulatory filings, Facebook said the
shift is happening fastest in places like the United States, Brazil and
India.
Second, even if Facebook can figure out how to serve up more and
better mobile ads, the company lags behind its rivals on mobile
strategy. Apple (AAPL)
and Google make the operating software for the most popular smartphones
on the market. It's possible that over time, Google could integrate its
Facebook competitor, Google+, into its Android phones and tablets more
seamlessly than Facebook, giving it an advantage with consumers. In the
last couple years, Zuckerberg has attempted to forge closer ties with
Apple. The companies have held multiple rounds of discussions, according
to people with knowledge of the talks. But they have yet to find a
compelling way to collaborate, and in the meantime, Apple has chosen to
integrate Twitter, rather than Facebook, into its mobile software.
To combat its rivals, Facebook has moved aggressively to acquire mobile assets. Most notably, Facebook recently agreed to purchase the photo-sharing app Instagram for $1 billion.
The company will get a fast-growing product with tons of users and --
perhaps more importantly -- a pool of talented programmers experienced
in designing for handheld devices. The sale isn't expected to close,
according to recent regulatory filings, until later this year.
No. 3 China
Call it Facebook's black hole: The world's biggest social network, as of now, has no presence in China. With some 500 million people online, China is the world's largest Internet market by number of users. About half of those users are active on locally grown social networks. It's a vast and potentially lucrative market for Facebook, but for the time being it's likely to remain elusive.
Call it Facebook's black hole: The world's biggest social network, as of now, has no presence in China. With some 500 million people online, China is the world's largest Internet market by number of users. About half of those users are active on locally grown social networks. It's a vast and potentially lucrative market for Facebook, but for the time being it's likely to remain elusive.
Zuckerberg's interest in China is no secret. He has been learning
Mandarin and has visited the country on various occasions, most recently
in March, when he traveled to Shanghai with his Chinese-American
girlfriend, Priscilla Chan. Inside Facebook,
Zuckerberg's has led intense discussions among senior management on the
risks and rewards of going into the Chinese market, according to people
familiar with the situation. And he has held discussions with various
Chinese Internet companies, including search giant Baidu, to explore
potential joint ventures, which would almost certainly be required for
Facebook to be allowed to operate in the country.
Zuckerberg is also said to be eyeing China as a source of talented
engineers. In recent months, however, the internal and external
discussions about China have died down as the attention of Facebook's
senior brass has been focused on the I.P.O., the people familiar with
the discussions said. In its I.P.O. prospectus, Facebook acknowledged
the obvious, saying the Chinese market "has substantial legal and
regulatory complexities," but that the company will "continue to
evaluate entering China."
For now, Facebook is likely to focus its international expansion
efforts in countries like Japan and South Korea, where it is struggling
to compete with local rivals, and emerging markets like India and
Brazil, where Facebook has made significant inroads but has lots of room
to grow. Down the line, Zuckerberg and Co. will no doubt try to
formulate a China strategy. Whether it will ever pay off is an open
question. After all, it's the Chinese government, not Facebook, that
will have final say on whether Facebook can enter the market there. That
leaves investors thinking of China as potential bonus whose value may
never be realized. "I'm not paying anything for China," says Lou Kerner,
founder of the Social Internet Fund, which invests in private shares of
social and mobile companies.
-- with reporting by Alex Konrad
SOURCE: www.cnn.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment if you can.